Dealing with Rendered issues?

Crawl your website with Sitebulb for 300+ tech SEO checks

Try for Free
High This Hint is very important, and definitely warrants attention. Issue This Hint represents an error or problem that needs to be fixed.

Canonical only in the rendered HTML

This means that the URL in question contains a canonical element which is only present in the rendered HTML, and is not present in the response HTML.

Why is this important?

Rendering webpages is a resource intensive task, and it takes significantly longer than simply grabbing source (response) HTML content.

This is why Google essentially crawl URLs in a two-stage process: their 'first look' is of the HTML response, then they render the page and have a 'second look' at the rendered HTML, then they update the index based on what they found in the rendered HTML.

Google rendering

As such, it is unwise to provide differing indexing signals in the response and rendered HTML (i.e. robots, canonicals,hreflang, etc...)

Google themselves do not recommended injecting canonical tags using JavaScript. To be certain that Google are definitely able to recognise and respect the canonical tag, you should include it in the response HTML.

What does the Hint check?

This Hint will trigger for any internal URL that contains a canonical link element in the rendered HTML but not in the response HTML.

Examples that trigger this Hint

This Hint will trigger for any URL that has a canonical link element in the <head> of the rendered HTML, that is not present in the response HTML.

For example, if the response HTML looked like this:

<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta name="robots" content="index,follow">
...
</head>
<body>...</body>
</html>

And the rendered HTML looked like this:

<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta name="robots" content="index,follow">
<link rel="canonical" href="https://example.com" />
...
</head>
<body>...</body>
</html>

How do you resolve this issue?

Google have stated categorically that the rendered canonical is not taken into account, so relying on it for indexing purposes would be unwise.

In their documentation, Google clearly state that they don't recommend using JavaScript for handling canonicals, so the best solution is to ensure that the canonical is present in the HTML source, and is not changed during rendering.

Google do caveat their statement by saying, 'if you really have to do it, then do it this way':

Properly Inject Canonical Tag

Further Reading

Sitebulb Desktop

Ideal for SEO professionals, consultants and digital marketing agencies.

Try our fully featured 14 day trial. No credit card required.

Try Sitebulb for Free

Sitebulb Cloud

Perfect for collaboration, remote teams and extreme scale.

Cloud crawling with no project limits and very generous crawl limits.

Explore Sitebulb Cloud